Technofixing the Future in Mining Industry: Ethical Side Effects of Using AI and Big Data to Meet the SDGs

Authors

  • Petros Chavula Department of Environmental Studies, Geography and Planning, Maasai Mara University, P.O. 861-20500, Narok-Kenya & Department of Environmental Sciences, Pwani University, Kilifi Kenya. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7153-8233
  • Fredrick Kayusi Department of Environmental Studies, Geography and Planning, Maasai Mara University, P.O. 861-20500, Narok-Kenya & Department of Environmental Sciences, Pwani University, Kilifi Kenya. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1481-4016

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/ai2025407

Keywords:

Technofixing, Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Mining Ethics, Sustainable Development, Governance Frameworks

Abstract

Recent  advances in artificial intelligence (AI), big data, and non- geostationary  satellite (NGSO; LEO/MEO) services  promise  faster , safer , and “ greener ” mining , but  also  raise  ethical and governance  risks . This  study  interrogates  the  technofix narrative. Objectives  were  to  map NGSO+AI applications  across  the  mining  value  chain ; assess  technical , operational , environmental , and economic performance; examine governance , data rights , and justice  implications ; evaluate  capacity and procurement  models ( with  an East African  lens ); and distill  actionable  guidance . Following a PRISMA-2020 protocol , a mixed-methods  review ( database  inception –12 Aug 2025) of peer- reviewed and grey literature  was  undertaken  with  duplicate screening and appraisal (JBI, RoB 2/ROBINS-I, AACODS; GRADE/ CERQual ). Over 80 empirical  studies and initiatives  were  synthesized ; random-effects meta- analysis  was  used  where  outcomes  were comparable, alongside  realist narrative synthesis . NGSO connectivity  reduced  latency (LEO: tens of ms; MEO: ~100–200 ms) and high-revisit EO (SAR/ optical ) improved  surface-change  detection ; operational  gains ( uptime , reporting ) were  noted  but  with  low – moderate  certainty  given short follow -up and sponsorship . Governance  lagged  capability : data ownership and portability  were  unclear , third-party  audit  access rare, and community  participation  uneven ; ethical  risks  included  bias , privacy , and cultural impacts . East African  pilots  showed  technical  promise  amid  institutional gaps. NGSO+AI can advance SDG- aligned  mining  only  when  coupled  to  binding data rights , independent  assurance , participatory  pathways , open interfaces, and local capacity ; otherwise  tools  risk performative compliance  rather  than  accountable , just  outcomes .

References

1. P. Madureira, D. Squires, and L. P. Ribeiro, "The international seabed authority and the United Nations 2030 agenda for sustainable development," Resources policy, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.05.052

2. C. Saenz, "Creating shared value strategies to reach the United Nations sustainable development goals: Evidence from the mining industry," The Extractive Industries and Society, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101255

3. A. Endl, M. Tost, M. Hitch, P. Moser et al., "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101440

4. D. K. Nguyen and G. Sermpinis, "Big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning: A transformative symbiosis in favour of financial technology," *European Financial*, 2023. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/268977/

5. E. Clausen and A. Sörensen, "Required and desired: breakthroughs for future-proofing mineral and metal extraction," 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-022-00328-0

6. Brad, T. Haas, and E. Schneider, "Whose negative emissions? Exploring emergent perspectives on CDR from the EU's hard to abate and fossil industries," Frontiers in Climate, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2023.1268736

7. F. Aminjonov and L. C. Sim, "The Gulf states and the energy transition in the Indo-Pacific," Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 2023. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5109553

8. G. Li, D. A. Koomson, J. Huang, E. I. Amponsah, "A review from environmental management to environmental governance: paradigm shift for sustainable mining practice in Ghana," *Journal of Cleaner Production*, vol. 2021, pp. 1-15, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-020-01050-Z

9. S. Jackson, G. Poelzer, G. Poelzer, and B. Noble, "Mining and sustainability in the circumpolar North: the role of government in advancing corporate social responsibility," Environmental Management, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01680-1

10. M. Onifade, T. Zvarivadza, J. A. Adebisi, K. O. Said, "Advancing toward sustainability: The emergence of green mining technologies and practices," in *Green and Smart Mining*, Elsevier, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsme.2024.05.005

11. F. Kayusi and P. Chavula, “Enhancing Urban Green Spaces: AI-Driven Insights for Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Services,” LatIA, vol. 2, p. 87, Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.62486/latia202587

12. F. Arthur-Holmes and G. Ofosu, "… -led formalisation of artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM): Towards mining licence categorisation, women empowerment and environmental sustainability," Resources Policy, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105058

13. F. Adu-Baffour, T. Daum, and R. Birner, "Governance challenges of small-scale gold mining in Ghana: Insights from a process net-map study," Land use policy, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105271

14. P. Chavula and F. Kayusi, “Systematic Review on the Application of Nanotechnology and Artificial Intelligence in Agricultural Economics,” LatIA, vol. 3, p. 322, May 2025, https://doi.org/10.62486/latia2025322

15. M. Onifade, K. O. Said, and A. P. Shivute, "Safe mining operations through technological advancement," in *Safety and Environmental Protection*, 2023, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.05.052

16. H. Wang, K. Li, J. Zhang, L. Hong et al., "Monitoring and analysis of ground surface settlement in mining clusters by SBAS-InSAR technology," Sensors, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103711

17. A. Wu, Y. Wang, Z. Ruan, B. Xiao, J. Wang, "Key theory and technology of cemented paste backfill for green mining of metal mines," Green and Smart Mining, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsme.2024.04.003

18. C. Cacciuttolo Vargas and G. Pérez Campomanes, "Practical experience of filtered tailings technology in Chile and Peru: an environmentally friendly solution," Minerals, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070889

A. Pons, C. Vintró Sánchez, J. M. Rius Torrentó, "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility in mining industries," 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102117

19. R. A. Hodge, M. Ericsson, O. Löf, A. Löf et al., "The global mining industry: corporate profile, complexity, and change," Mineral Economics, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-022-00343-1

20. Z. S. Ageed and S. R. M. Zeebaree, "Comprehensive survey of big data mining approaches in cloud systems," Qubahan Academic Journal, vol. 2021, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v1n2a46

21. I. Zumente and N. Lāce, "ESG Rating—Necessity for the Investor or the Company?," Sustainability, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168940

22. Z. Feng and Z. Wu, "ESG disclosure, REIT debt financing and firm value," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-021-09857-x

23. P. R. Rau and T. Yu, "A survey on ESG: investors, institutions and firms," China Finance Review International, 2024. https://www.unpri.org/about-us/about-the-pri

24. E. C. Merem, Y. A. Twumasi, J. Wesley, D. Olagbegi, "The assessment of China's scramble for natural resources extraction in Africa," *World …*, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5923/J.ENV.20211101.02

25. S. P. Michaux, "The mining of minerals and the limits to growth," Geological Survey of Finland: Espoo, . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351712079

26. L. Foster, K. Szilagyi, A. Wairegi, C. Oguamanam, "Smart farming and artificial intelligence in East Africa: Addressing indigeneity, plants, and gender," Agricultural Technology, vol. 2023, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100132

27. F. OF Fadipe, "Indigenous technology and its contribution to the socio-economic development of contemporary Africa," in 2024 International Conference on Electronic, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10002743

28. A. Gwagwa, E. Kazim, and A. Hilliard, "The role of the African value of Ubuntu in global AI inclusion discourse: A normative ethics perspective," Patterns, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100462

29. M. S. A. Adamu, "Rethinking technology design and deployment in Africa: lessons from an african standpoint," in *Proceedings of the 3rd African Human-Computer Interaction Conference*, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448696.3448704

30. J. Muldoon and B. A. Wu, "Artificial intelligence in the colonial matrix of power," Philosophy & Technology, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00687-8

31. N. Mvile and O. K. Bishoge, "Mining industry's potential for community development, challenges, and way forward in the East Africa community. A review," Local Development & Society, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/26883597.2024.2423948

32. F. Kayusi, P. Chavula, G. Lungu, and H. Mambwe, “AI-Driven Climate Modeling: Validation and Uncertainty Mapping – Methodologies and Challenges,” LatIA, vol. 3, p. 332, Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.62486/latia2025332

Downloads

Published

2025-08-14

Issue

Section

Original

How to Cite

1.
Chavula P, Kayusi F. Technofixing the Future in Mining Industry: Ethical Side Effects of Using AI and Big Data to Meet the SDGs. EthAIca [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 14 [cited 2025 Sep. 5];4:407. Available from: https://ai.ageditor.ar/index.php/ai/article/view/407