Smart Teaching in Rural Indonesia: Harnessing AI-Assisted Deep Learning for Teacher Professional Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/ai2025419Keywords:
deep learning, joyful, meaningful, mindful, the 21st-century skillsAbstract
This study presents an innovative AI-assisted TPD framework that uses Microsoft Copilot and AI-powered lesson plan generators to fully incorporate Indonesia’s four core teacher competencies: pedagogy, professionalism, social engagement, and interpersonal development, while applying deep learning principles of joyful, meaningful, and mindful education. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study combined quantitative experimental analysis with qualitative teacher perceptions to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-assisted interventions. Results from an independent t-test showed a significant increase in post-test scores among the experimental group, with a t-value of 17,1 exceeding the critical value of 1,984 (α = 0,05, df = 98), leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. This indicates that AI-assisted training had a meaningful and statistically significant impact on teacher development. Moreover, AI promotes community-based learning, improves institutional readiness, and encourages educators to think globally while acting locally. Despite these benefits, challenges remain, such as interpersonal disengagement, cultural and pedagogical mismatches, difficulties in curriculum adaptation, the need for prompt engineering skills, and concerns about teacher autonomy. However, the limited duration of the intervention is a constraint, suggesting that long-term engagement is necessary for sustained improvement. Policy efforts should focus on extending training periods and integrating culturally responsive AI pedagogy.
References
1. Chen R, Lee VR, G Lee M. A cross-sectional look at teacher reactions, worries, and professional development needs related to generative AI in an urban school district. Education and Information Technologies [Internet]. 2025 Feb 19;30(11):16045–82. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13350-w
2. Wang M, Chen Z, Liu Q, Peng X, Long T, Shi Y. Understanding teachers’ willingness to use artificial intelligence-based teaching analysis system: extending TAM model with teaching efficacy, goal orientation, anxiety, and trust. Interactive Learning Environments [Internet]. 2024 Jul;1–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2365345
3. Ardiningtyas SY, Butarbutar R, Weda S, Nur S. Online scaffolding behavior for speaking EFL improvement: narrative inquiry issues. Interactive Learning Environments [Internet]. 2023 May 7;32(9):5009–19. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2207608
4. Butarbutar R, González Vallejo R. Factors Influencing AI-Assisted Thesis Writing in University: A Pull-Push-Mooring Theory Narrative Inquiry Study. Data and Metadata [Internet]. 2025 Feb 10;4:203. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.56294/dm2025203
5.Butarbutar R, Ruing FH, Basri N, Tuharea VU, Radja Leba SM. Unpacking Online Collaborative Learning in Teaching EFL Speaking: Insights from Three Rural Area Case Studies. The Qualitative Report [Internet]. 2023 Dec 15; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6165
6. Hasyim N, Arismunandar, Butarbutar R, Ramli AM, Malik Nur ID. Mind mapping of teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning: A reflective study of urban and suburban areas. Cogent Education [Internet]. 2024 Jan 18;11(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2292864
7. Fredy, Lieung KW, Butarbutar R, Duli A. Science process skills in learning environmental pollution using PBL models. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science [Internet]. 2019 Oct 1;343(1):012179. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012179
8. Nurhadi K, Rahman Abd, Khasyar ML, Suharwanto S. The emotional geography of faculty members engaging in virtual teacher professional development (VTPD): evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education [Internet]. 2024 Apr 9;17(2):663–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-06-2022-0187
9. Simatupang EC, Ismail I, Waluyo B, Panmei B. ChatGPT in Education: The Influence of Institutional Support and Peer Dynamics in Indonesian Higher Education. Internet Reference Services Quarterly [Internet]. 2025 Feb 13;29(2):225–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2025.2461476
10. Tatik T, Nguyen HTM, Loughland T. Exploring factors influencing Indonesian novice teachers’ achievement of teacher professional standards during induction: A cultural-historical activity theory perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education [Internet]. 2025 Jun;159:105013. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105013
11. Fernandez RS, Hayes K, Carpenter K, Gayosso F. Artificial Intelligence and NDE Competencies. Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation 40 [Internet]. 2025;1–58. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48200-8_24-2
12. Mufanti R, Carter D, England N. Outcomes-based education in Indonesian higher education: Reporting on the understanding, challenges, and support available to teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open [Internet]. 2024;9:100873. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100873
13.Shapira N, Amzalag M. A teacher professional development program for online learning in times of crisis. Teacher Development. [Internet]. 2025 May 2;1–23. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2025.2496441
14. Ding ACE, Shi L, Yang H, Choi I. Enhancing teacher AI literacy and integration through different types of cases in teacher professional development. Computers and Education Open [Internet]. 2024 Jun;6:100178. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100178
15.Aguilar-Cruz PJ, Salas-Pilco SZ. Teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence in Colombia: AI technological access, AI teacher professional development and AI ethical awareness. Technology, Pedagogy and Education [Internet]. 2025 Jan 22;34(2):219–38. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2025.2451865
16. Lan G, Feng X, Du S, Song F, Xiao Q. Integrating ethical knowledge in generative AI education: constructing the GenAI-TPACK framework for university teachers’ professional development. Education and Information Technologies [Internet]. 2025 Feb 12;30(11):15621–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13427-6
17. Kim K, Kwon K. Unveiling teacher identity development: A case study of AI curriculum implementation in a rural middle school computer science class. Teaching and Teacher Education [Internet]. 2025 Jul;160:105032. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105032
18. Ng DTK, Chan EKC, Lo CK. Opportunities, challenges and school strategies for integrating generative AI in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence [Internet]. 2025 Jun;8:100373. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100373
19. Knowles M. Adult Learning Processes: Pedagogy And Andragogy. Religious Education [Internet]. 1977 Mar;72(2):202–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0034408770720210
20. Knowles M, Holton III EF, Robinson PA, Caraccioli C. The Adult Learner. 2024 Oct 28; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003387671
21.Huang L, Liang M, Xiong Y, Wu X, Lim CP. A systematic review of technology-enabled teacher professional development during COVID -19 pandemic. Computers & Education [Internet]. 2024 Dec;223:105168. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105168
22.Ravet J, Mtika P. Educational inclusion in resource-constrained contexts: a study of rural primary schools in Cambodia. International Journal of Inclusive Education [Internet]. 2021 Apr 15;28(1):16–37. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1916104
23. Zhao, Q, Chen, Y, Liang, J. Attitudes and usage patterns of educators towards large language models: Implications for professional development and classroom innovation. Academia Nexus Journal. 2024;3(2).
24. Cai H, Zhang Q, Bai J, Yang X, Cheng X. Review-based learning by teaching promoted deeper learning competencies of the challenged students. The Journal of Educational Research [Internet]. 2025 Feb 13;118(3):257–67. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2464043
25. Fundi M, Sanusi IT, Oyelere SS, Ayere M. Advancing AI education: Assessing Kenyan in-service teachers’ preparedness for integrating artificial intelligence in competence-based curriculum. Computers in Human Behavior Reports [Internet]. 2024 May;14:100412. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100412
26. Kaczorowski T, Stockman A, Hashey A, Kaczorowski J. Early Adopters: Navigating AI Integration in Special Education Teacher Preparation. Journal of Special Education Preparation [Internet]. 2024 Sep 2;4(2):18–29. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.33043/9ca46254
27. Chick NL, Haynie A, Gurung RAR. From Generic to Signature Pedagogies. Exploring Signature Pedagogies [Internet]. 2023 Jun 26;1–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003444732-1
28. Huber MT, Morreale SP. Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning [Internet]. Routledge; 2023. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003444268
29. Getenet S. Mapping initial teacher education program courses with professional standards of teachers: implications for professional learning. Quality Assurance in Education [Internet]. 2025 Feb 11; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/qae-10-2024-0202
30. Rodrigues L, Pompea SM, Meneses A, Montenegro M. A Characterization of Astronomy Teacher Professional Development Programs in Chile. Journal of Science Teacher Education [Internet]. 2024 Jul 22;36(1):72–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2024.2375840
31. Steinert Y, editor. Faculty Development in the Health Professions [Internet]. Springer Netherlands; 2014. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7612-8
32. O’Neill G, Short A. Relevant, practical and connected to the real world: what higher education students say engages them in the curriculum. Irish Educational Studies [Internet]. 2023 Jun 19;44(1):23–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2221663
33. Nawas A, Darmawan IGN, Maadad N. Certified to succeed? Multilevel analysis of the effects of teacher certification on educator well-being and student outcomes in Indonesia. Teaching and Teacher Education [Internet]. 2025 Aug;162:105069. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105069
34. Hajovsky DB, Chesnut SR, Helbig, KA, Goranowski SM. On the Examination of Longitudinal Trends Between Teacher–Student Relationship Quality and Social Skills During Elementary School. School Psychology Review [Internet]. 2021 Mar 30;52(6):679–95. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2372966x.2021.1883995
35.Jaedun A, Nurtanto M, Mutohhari F, Saputro IN, Kholifah N. Perceptions of vocational school students and teachers on the development of interpersonal skills towards Industry 5.0. Cogent Education [Internet]. 2024 Jul 15;11(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2375184
36. Fulmore JA, Olson J, Maellaro R. Aligning Leadership Education: Linking Interpersonal Skills Development to Business Needs. Journal of Management Education [Internet]. 2022 Nov 13;47(3):263–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10525629221133369
37. Moreira MA, Arcas B, Sánchez T, García R, Melero MJ, Cunha N, et al. Teachers’ pedagogical competences in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice [Internet]. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):90–123. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.53761/1.20.01.07
38. Hargie O. Skill in theory: Communication as skilled performance. The Handbook of Communication Skills [Internet]. 2025 Feb 25;3–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003367796-2
39.Opstoel K, Prins F, Haerens L, van Tartwijk J, De Martelaer K. Transferring responsibility in primary school physical education: Experiences of five teachers participating in a professional development programme. Teaching and Teacher Education [Internet]. 2025 Jan;153:104844. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104844
40. Zhou W, Liang F, Guo H, Li B. Research on Personal Skills That Architects Should Focus on Improving in Professional Career Development. Sustainability [Internet]. 2025 Jan 26;17(3):995. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su17030995
41. Gregersen T, Mercer S, MacIntyre P, Talbot K, Banga CA. Understanding language teacher wellbeing: An ESM study of daily stressors and uplifts. Language Teaching Research [Internet]. 2020 Oct 21;27(4):862–83. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168820965897
42.Moreira MA, Arcas B, Sánchez T, García R, Melero MJ, Cunha N, et al. Teachers’ pedagogical competences in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice [Internet]. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):90–123. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.53761/1.20.01.07
43. Baatz J, Wirzberger M. Resilience as a professional competence: a new way towards healthy teachers? Social Psychology of Education [Internet]. 2025 Jan 31;28(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-10010-8
44. Luo (Jess) J. How does GenAI affect trust in teacher-student relationships? Insights from students’ assessment experiences. Teaching in Higher Education [Internet]. 2024 Apr 20;30(4):991–1006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2024.2341005
45. Xu D, Liu Y, Shea ZM, Vincent-Layton K, White J, Pacansky-Brock M. Humanizing college online instruction: The effects of professional development on faculty perceptions and instructional practices. The Internet and Higher Education [Internet]. 2025 Apr;65:100998. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100998
46. Fiharsono A, Carey M, Hyde M, Beazley H, Yektiningtyas-Modouw W. Culturally based learning needs of Korowai students in a lowland-remote area of Indonesian Papua: school physical environment and building design. The Australian Educational Researcher [Internet]. 2023 Feb 27;51(2):611–29. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00615-x
47. Call K, Christie M, Simon S. Do Preservice Teachers Believe They Use the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers to Inform Their Professional Learning? Australian Journal of Teacher Education [Internet]. 2021 Jun;46(6):98–114. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n6.6
48. Fullan M, Quinn J. La cohérence. 2018 Jan 31; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14375/np.9782760547414
49. Quinn J, McEachen J, Fullan M, Gardner M, Drummy M. S’engager dans l’apprentissage en profondeur. 2021 Aug 26; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14375/np.9782760554702
50.Fullan M, Azorín C, Harris A, Jones M. Artificial intelligence and school leadership: challenges, opportunities and implications. School Leadership & Management [Internet]. 2023 Aug 27;44(4):339–46. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2246856
51. Fullan M, Gallagher M J. Transforming systems, deep learning and the equity hypothesis. 2017 Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
52. Kim K, Kwon K. Unveiling teacher identity development: A case study of AI curriculum implementation in a rural middle school computer science class. Teaching and Teacher Education [Internet]. 2025 Jul;160:105032. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105032
53. Bingham A. Deductive and Inductive Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis: The Five-Cycle Process. Proceedings of the 2021 AERA Annual Meeting [Internet]. 2021; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1682697
54. Bingham AJ. From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods [Internet]. 2023 Aug 10;22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
55. Keeney P. Academic Freedom and the Poverty of Rights Talk. Chiang Mai University Journal of Humanities, 2025. 26, 10-21.
56.Edling S. Broadening and Deepening Teachers’ Professional Vision through Science and Scientific Theories: A Conversation between John Dewey and Hans‐Georg Gadamer. Educational Theory [Internet]. 2025 Feb;75(1):107–28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/edth.12679
57. Hughes JK, Layne K, Kolbfleisch D, Misciagno SA. Experiential Learning Theory. Routledge Companion to Occupational Therapy [Internet]. 2025 Feb 12;698–710. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003526766-56
58. Karataş F, Eriçok B, Tanrikulu L. Reshaping curriculum adaptation in the age of artificial intelligence: Mapping teachers’ AI‐driven curriculum adaptation patterns. British Educational Research Journal [Internet]. 2024 Sep 14;51(1):154–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/berj.4068
59. Dong Y. Revolutionizing Academic English Writing through AI-Powered Pedagogy: Practical Exploration of Teaching Process and Assessment. Journal of Higher Education Research [Internet]. 2023 Apr 24;4(2):52. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.32629/jher.v4i2.1188
60. Chen JJ, Lin JC. Artificial intelligence as a double-edged sword: Wielding the POWER principles to maximize its positive effects and minimize its negative effects. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood [Internet]. 2023 Apr 17;25(1):146–53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14639491231169813
61. Sun J, Ma H, Zeng Y, Han D, Jin Y. Promoting the AI teaching competency of K-12 computer science teachers: A TPACK-based professional development approach. Education and Information Technologies [Internet]. 2022 Jul 30;28(2):1509–33. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11256-5
62. Yeh HC. The synergy of generative AI and inquiry-based learning: transforming the landscape of English teaching and learning. Interactive Learning Environments [Internet]. 2024 Apr 4;33(1):88–102. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2335491
63. Zimmerman HT, Land SM, Faimon L, Chiu YC. Mobile augmented reality supporting families’ immersive collaborative learning: Learning-on-the-move for place-based geoscience sense-making. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning [Internet]. 2023 Jun;18(2):291–322. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09399-9
64.Yang Y, Xia Q, Liu C, Chiu TKF. The impact of TPACK on teachers’ willingness to integrate generative artificial intelligence (GenAI): The moderating role of negative emotions and the buffering effects of need satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education [Internet]. 2025 Feb;154:104877. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104877
65. Alessandro G, Dimitri O, Cristina B, Anna M. The emotional impact of generative AI: negative emotions and perception of threat. Behaviour & Information Technology [Internet]. 2024 Mar 26;44(4):676–93. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2024.2333933
66. Krause S, Panchal BH, Ubhe N. Evolution of Learning: Assessing the Transformative Impact of Generative AI on Higher Education. Frontiers of Digital Education [Internet]. 2025 May 8;2(2). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44366-025-0058-7
67. Shahzad MF, Xu S, Zahid H. Exploring the impact of generative AI-based technologies on learning performance through self-efficacy, fairness & ethics, creativity, and trust in higher education. Education and Information Technologies [Internet]. 2024 Aug 24;30(3):3691–716. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12949-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Seli Marlina Radja Leba, Tobias Nggaruaka, Ranta Butarbutar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
